“Lost in the Sauce”: How Early Childhood Educators Navigate the Process of Reporting Child Sexual Abuse

dc.contributor.authorCordero, A. J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T18:20:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T18:20:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAccording to ACF (2018) every 9 minutes, Child Protective Services (CPS) substantiates, or receives evidence of, a claim of child sexual abuse (CSA). Children who are sexually abused are likely to experience a variety of short- and long-term effects; including, but not limited to: (i) depression; (ii) anger and/or aggressive behaviors; (iii) trouble sleeping; (iv) behavior problems; and (v) anxiety (Bernier, Hébert, & CollinVézina, 2013; van der Kolk, 2003). Given that CSA is one of the seven identified ACEs (Filetti et al., 1998) CSA victims are also likely to experience effects lasting well into adolescence and adulthood; these effects include, but are not limited to, drug abuse and suicide. Researchers have determined that, given their level of access to children, teachers make ideal detectors and reporters of child sexual abuse (e.g. Smith, 2005). However, research (e.g. Mathews et al., 2017) has found that there is a tendency to under-report cases of child maltreatment and neglect to CPS. Given that an estimated 35% of CSA victims are under the age of 7 (Brilleslijper-Kater, Friedrich, & Corwin, 2004) it is important to understand the knowledge, beliefs, and experiences of early childhood educators with respect to CSA. The following research question, How do early childhood educators navigate the process of reporting child sexual abuse?, was explored using a constructivist grounded theory design. The interviews of six teachers, in addition to analytic memos, were code and led to the emergence of five categories: (i) training; (ii) detection; (iii) consulting; (iv) reporting; and (v) coping. These categories later emerged into the theoretical stages iii of reporting CSA to CPS; which were found to either be experienced: (i) linearly, meaning the stages have little overlap; or (ii) fluidly, meaning there is overlap between each, or some, of the five stages. These theoretical stages can be used to: (i) understand the overall experience of reporting CSA to CPS; and (ii) potentially, to understand why there is a tendency to under-report cases of CSA, and other forms of child maltreatment, to CPS. Future research recommendations include replicating this work in other parts of the country to present a more holistic understanding regarding the training, detection, and reporting experiences of early childhood educators with respect to CSA, but also other forms of child maltreatment and neglect.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCordero, A. J. (2020). “Lost in the Sauce”: How Early Childhood Educators Navigate the Process of Reporting Child Sexual Abuse. Clemson University. All Dissertations. 2632.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3637&context=all_dissertations
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/4766
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherClemson Universityen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuseen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectreportingen_US
dc.subjecteducatorsen_US
dc.subjectmandatory reportingen_US
dc.title“Lost in the Sauce”: How Early Childhood Educators Navigate the Process of Reporting Child Sexual Abuseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files