Can the Child Welfare System Protect Children Without Believing What They Say?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorUrs, T.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-19T15:01:50Z
dc.date.available2015-11-19T15:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractIn Kennedy v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court noted that the problem of “unreliable, induced, and even imagined child testimony” creates a “special risk of wrongful execution in some child rape cases.” Indeed, empirical research has repeatedly demonstrated problems with accuracy in children’s accounts of their own experiences. Although the research and commentary in this area has focused on how allegations of child sexual abuse are addressed in the criminal justice system, these studies have much broader implications: every year, state officials conduct millions of interviews with children in the context of child welfare investigations. These investigations have serious consequences for families — for instance, they can lead to the placement of a child in foster care or the termination of parental rights. This article examines the reliability of child welfare determinations by looking at a subset of the information investigators consider: children’s statements about their past experiences. First, this article reviews empirical research on suggestibility, lie-telling behavior, and the capacity of adults to detect lies in children. The article then examines the impact of structural features in the child welfare system, and posits that these structural features do not facilitate the proper evaluation of child statements. The article concludes by proposing legal reforms to improve the reliability of child welfare determinations. Ultimately, this article aims to defend the proposition that caring deeply about children and their safety does not necessarily mean the child welfare system should rely on what children say. (Author Abstract)en_US
dc.identifier.citationUrs, T. (2014). Can the Child Welfare System Protect Children Without Believing What They Say?. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 38(2), 305-357.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2534189_code2232912.pdf?abstractid=2534189&mirid=1&type=2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/2646
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNew York University Review of Law & Social Changeen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjecttestimonyen_US
dc.subjecttruthen_US
dc.subjectmemoryen_US
dc.subjectaccuracyen_US
dc.subjectreviewen_US
dc.subjectpolicyen_US
dc.titleCan the Child Welfare System Protect Children Without Believing What They Say?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources