Applying suggestibility research to the real world: The case of repeated questions

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLyon, T. D.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T20:47:36Z
dc.date.available2014-11-25T20:47:36Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractThis article will analyze particular strands of each trend. With respect to the law of the child witness, it will consider the application of the medical diagnosis hearsay exception to sexual abuse cases, using as a case study State v. Larson,1 a Minnesota case that made its way to the United States Supreme Court. The analysis will show how restrictive application of the medical diagnosis exception forces courts to confront the dangers of children’s suggestibility.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLyon, T. D. (2002). Applying suggestibility research to the real world: The case of repeated questions. Law & Contemporary Problems, 65, 97-126.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=thomaslyon
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/1896
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLaw & Contemporary Problemsen_US
dc.subjectsuggestibilityen_US
dc.subjectrepeated questionsen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectchild witnessen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.titleApplying suggestibility research to the real world: The case of repeated questionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources