The child abuse lottery—Will the doctor suspect and report? Physician attitudes towards and reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVan Haeringen, A. R., Dadds, M., & Armstrong, K. L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T19:34:16Z
dc.date.available2014-07-22T19:34:16Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the responsiveness and attitudes of medical practitioners to the reporting of suspected child abuse or neglect. To determine whether characteristics of the medical practitioner (specialist or generalist, rural or urban based, age since graduation, gender, having children of their own) influenced the responsiveness to reporting. Method: A survey of all members of the Australian College of Pediatrics in Queensland (Australia) and pediatric registrars at a tertiary training hospital in Brisbane (n = 124) and a random sample of Queensland general practitioners (n = 100). The survey requested demographic details, responses to three case vignettes suggestive of possible physical abuse or neglect, and details of suspected child abuse or neglect reporting behavior. Results: There were a wide range of responses to the case vignettes, but responses did not vary between specialties. Forty-three percent of all doctors had at some stage considered a case as suspected child abuse or neglect and decided not to report despite a legal mandate to do so. General practitioners were more cautious towards reporting. The reasons for not reporting were multiple but highlighted perceived problems in the services available for the child and family once a report was made. Conclusions: There is need for continuing education of medical practitioners regarding symptoms and signs of physical abuse and the role of doctors in the multidisciplinary management of child abuse. To some extent children's outcome when presenting to medical practitioners as a result of child abuse or neglect is no better than a lottery, dependent on which doctor they happen to see. (Author Abstract)en_US
dc.identifier.citationVan Haeringen, A. R., Dadds, M., & Armstrong, K. L. (1998). The child abuse lottery—will the doctor suspect and report? Physician attitudes towards and reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect. Child abuse & neglect, 22(3), 159-169.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ac.els-cdn.com/S0145213497001725/1-s2.0-S0145213497001725-main.pdf?_tid=6001f2c6-9344-4dd3-a17f-02b4d449384c&acdnat=1545076213_a1a316d79ea7f8e4ad3d5170026abe2a
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/1587
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChild Abuse & Neglecten_US
dc.subjectneglecten_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectchild maltreatmenten_US
dc.subjectMandated reportingen_US
dc.subjectphysiciansen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectInternational Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.titleThe child abuse lottery—Will the doctor suspect and report? Physician attitudes towards and reporting of suspected child abuse and neglecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources