Post-implementation of a Safe Harbor law in the US: Review of state administrative data

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAzzopardi, C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T17:30:08Z
dc.date.available2021-09-24T17:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractGender-based relations of power and attributions of blame for child sexual abuse have been longstanding in child welfare policy and practice. Nonoffending mothers continue to be ascribed responsibility through the ideologically and institutionally entrenched doctrine of failure to protect. Feminist critical discourse analysis was used to (a) expose and disrupt dominant discourses of gender, motherhood, and risk that operate to construct and reinforce notions of blame and failure to protect, as enacted by way of child welfare text in context; and (b) build a credible case for social and organizational change grounded in an alternative discourse with greater explanatory power. Progressive avenues for resistance, negotiation, and transformation are proposed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAzzopardi, C. (2021). Gendered Attributions of Blame and Failure to Protect in Child Welfare Responses to Sexual Abuse: A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Violence Against Women, 10778012211024263.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10778012211024263
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/5225
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherViolence Against Womenen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuseen_US
dc.subjectblameen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectchild welfareen_US
dc.subjectfailure to protecten_US
dc.subjectnonoffending caregiversen_US
dc.subjectCanadaen_US
dc.subjectInternational Resourcesen_US
dc.titlePost-implementation of a Safe Harbor law in the US: Review of state administrative dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources