Tort Liability of Churches for Clergy Child Abuse after the Royal Commission: Implications of Developments in the Law of Vicarious Liability and Non-Delegable Duty

dc.contributor.authorFoster, N. J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-18T14:42:49Z
dc.date.available2016-10-18T14:42:49Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractWhile the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has made a number of recommendations concerning a range of Australian institutions, some of the most difficult issues concern the liability of Christian churches. While the churches are committed to being part of a statutory recompense scheme, there seems no doubt that general tort liability will remain for some victims, and in relation to churches there are a number of unresolved problems. Questions surrounding corporate personality and who may be sued need to be answered. In particular, however, there is still some uncertainty in Australian law as to whether sexual abuse committed by clergy can be sheeted home to churches under the principles of vicarious liability or non-delegable duty. This paper explores these issues, including recent statutory responses, and suggests some ways forward for common law courts.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFoster, N. J. (2018). Tort Liability of Churches for Clergy Child Abuse after the Royal Commission: Implications of Developments in the Law of Vicarious Liability and Non-Delegable Duty.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://works.bepress.com/neil_foster/127/download/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/3006
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Newcastle - Australiaen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectliabilityen_US
dc.subjectInternational Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.titleTort Liability of Churches for Clergy Child Abuse after the Royal Commission: Implications of Developments in the Law of Vicarious Liability and Non-Delegable Dutyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files