Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't…If You're a Girl: Relational and Normative Contexts of Adolescent Sexting in the United States

dc.contributor.authorLippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-04T18:02:19Z
dc.date.available2017-08-04T18:02:19Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the relational, normative, gender, and age dynamics of adolescent sexting in the USA using open-ended questionnaires. Girls in the study were no more likely than boys to sext; however, they were more likely to experience pressure to do so, particularly from boys. Girls were commonly judged harshly whether they sexted (e.g., “slut”) or not (e.g., “prude”), whereas boys were virtually immune from criticism regardless. Older adolescents described sexting as occurring primarily within the context of flirting, romance, or sex, whereas younger adolescents reported what might be described as “pre-sexting” behaviors, involving the joking exchange of sexually suggestive (but non-nude) photos with platonic friends. Although some adolescents expressed a fear that sexting might lead to reputational damage, the normative climate and desire for approval motivated some to sext regardless. Implications and avenues for future research are offered in the discussion.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don't… if you're a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the united states. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371-386.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/3482
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Children and Mediaen_US
dc.subjectsextingen_US
dc.subjectadolescentsen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectcoercionen_US
dc.titleDamned If You Do, Damned If You Don't…If You're a Girl: Relational and Normative Contexts of Adolescent Sexting in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files