Domestic Violence, Child Abuse, and Trustworthiness Exceptions after Crawford

dc.contributor.authorRaeder, M. S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-18T17:03:22Z
dc.date.available2014-03-18T17:03:22Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.description.abstractCrawford is like the elephant in the room—counsel can’t tiptoe around it, making believe it is not there. Yet, until the Court gives more direction as to Crawford ’s contours, the case law will continue to produce inconsistent results that are reminiscent of another elephant story, the one in which three blind men touched the creature in different places and found that their descriptions had little in common. (Author)en_US
dc.identifier.citationRaeder, M. S. (2005). Domestic Violence, Child Abuse, and Trustworthiness Exceptions after Crawford. Criminal Justice, 20(2), 24-35en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncdsv.org/images/DVChildAbuseTrustworthinessExceptions.pdf  
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/1321
dc.publisherCriminal Justiceen_US
dc.subjectCrawforden_US
dc.subjectdomestic violenceen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.titleDomestic Violence, Child Abuse, and Trustworthiness Exceptions after Crawforden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files