Institutional Oppression That Silences Child Protection Reform

dc.contributor.authorBraithwaite, V.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T17:17:08Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T17:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractFrom its inception, child protection policy has been infused with domination, and over the long arc of history has been accompanied by the spread of institutional oppression. A case study of Australian child protection policy and practice illustrates how Iris Marion Young’s (1992) fve faces of oppression ((a) exploitation, (b) marginalization, (c) cultural imperialism, (d) powerlessness, and (e) violence) have pervaded the child protection system across time. Further, a secondary analysis of data from the Capacity Building Projects (2008–13) shows how oppression silences families, carers, community workers, and government child protection workers. Informal care networks, restorative justice, and responsive regulation enable silenced voices to be heard but remain at the fringes of child protection practice. Their potential will be reached only with a whole-of-child-protection regulatory reft in which open networks of dialogue are prioritized over networks of oppressive control.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBraithwaite, V. (2021). Institutional Oppression That Silences Child Protection Reform. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 1-24.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c05f8595cfd7901fc57139d/t/6078421ad1b2c069e0031fb1/1618493980996/Braithwaite-2021-International_Journal_on_Child_Maltreatment__Research%2C_Policy_and_Practice.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/5048
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practiceen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectInternational Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectchild protectionen_US
dc.subjectpolicyen_US
dc.subjectMarginalizationen_US
dc.subjectInformal networksen_US
dc.subjectRestorative justiceen_US
dc.titleInstitutional Oppression That Silences Child Protection Reformen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files