Anatomical Dolls and Diagrams: A position paper from Gundersen National Child Protection Training Center and the ChildFirst®/Finding Words Forensic Interview Training Programs

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGundersen National Child Protection Training Center
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-05T15:18:11Z
dc.date.available2016-10-05T15:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we explore the research to date, critique it in light of actual practice, and offer suggestions for future research on the use of media in forensic interviews. We begin by putting the debate over diagrams and dolls in the context of research on bias.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGundersen National Child Protection Training Center (2016). Anatomical Dolls and Diagrams: A position paper from Gundersen National Child Protection Training Center and the ChildFirst®/Finding Words Forensic Interview Training Programs.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://cdn2.zeroabuseproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/NCPTC-Anatomical-Dolls-and-Diagrams-position-paper.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/2979
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherGundersen National Child Protection Training Centeren_US
dc.subjectforensic interviewen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuseen_US
dc.subjectmediaen_US
dc.subjecthuman figure drawingsen_US
dc.subjectdollsen_US
dc.subjectposition paperen_US
dc.titleAnatomical Dolls and Diagrams: A position paper from Gundersen National Child Protection Training Center and the ChildFirst®/Finding Words Forensic Interview Training Programsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources