Maltreatment following Reunification: Predictors of Subsequent Child Protective Services Contact after Children Return Home

dc.contributor.authorConnell, C. M., Vanderploeg, J. J., Katz, K. H., Caron, C., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-14T15:18:30Z
dc.date.available2014-07-14T15:18:30Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractThis study examined risk of maltreatment among children exiting foster care using a statewide sample of children reunified between 2001 and 2004 in Rhode Island. The objectives were: (1) to compare rates of maltreatment following parental reunification for youth in care as a result of maltreatment with those in care for other reasons; and (2) to assess the effects of child, family, and case characteristics on rates of re-maltreatment among children placed in foster care due to maltreatment. Method: A longitudinal dataset of all reunified cases was matched with state records of substantiated Child Protective Service (CPS) investigations. Two Cox proportional hazards models were tested. The first model compared rates of subsequent maltreatment for two groups: children in foster care as a result of maltreatment, and those in care for other reasons. The second model investigated the effects of child, family, and case characteristics on re-maltreatment rates for those in care as a result of maltreatment. Results: Children in foster care due to maltreatment were significantly more likely to be maltreated following reunification. Among children in foster care due to maltreatment, factors that raised risk for re-maltreatment included a previous foster care placement, exiting care from a non-relative foster home, and removal due to neglect. Older adolescents had lower rates of re-maltreatment than infants. Child neglect was the primary type of recurrent maltreatment that occurred following reunification. Conclusions: Supports are needed for families about to be reunified, particularly when the removal was prompted by incidents of abuse or neglect. Incidents of neglect are particularly likely and appropriate services should specifically target factors contributing to neglect. Cases involving youth with a history of repeated foster care placement or in which non-relative placements are utilized may need additional supports. (Author Abstract)en_US
dc.identifier.citationConnell, C. M., Vanderploeg, J. J., Katz, K. H., Caron, C., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2009). Maltreatment following reunification: Predictors of subsequent Child Protective Services contact after children return home. Child abuse & neglect, 33(4), 218-228.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3867131/pdf/nihms523444.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/1566
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherChild Abuse & Neglecten_US
dc.subjectreunificationen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectchild welfareen_US
dc.subjectrisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectrevictimizationen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectneglecten_US
dc.titleMaltreatment following Reunification: Predictors of Subsequent Child Protective Services Contact after Children Return Homeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files