Spankers and Nonspankers: Where They Get Information on Spanking

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, W.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-23T15:44:15Z
dc.date.available2017-01-23T15:44:15Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractBecause spanking is common, puts children at risk for harmful side effects, and is ineffective as a positive behavior management tool, it is important to identify the kind of advice families receive about the appropriateness of spanking. Using the health belief model, I examined spankers and nonspankers on the spanking messages they received from eight sources of discipline information and how important they perceived these messages to be. Data from telephone interviews with 998 mothers with children aged 2 to 14 years showed that 33% of mothers rated advice from workshops, pediatricians, newspapers and magazines, and books as “very important.” Less than 15% rated parents and relatives and friends as such. Spankers perceived sources as recommending spanking, whereas nonspankers perceived sources as opposing spanking. Mothers were more likely to spank when they perceived more intense messages to spank, less intense messages opposing spanking, had younger children, and were of lower socioeconomic status. (Author Abstract)en_US
dc.identifier.citationWalsh, W. (2002). Spankers and nonspankers: Where they get information on spanking. Family Relations, 51(1), 81-88.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1099&context=soc_facpub
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/3155
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFamily relationsen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectphysical abuseen_US
dc.subjectcorporal punishmenten_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.titleSpankers and Nonspankers: Where They Get Information on Spankingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files