RESEARCH REPORT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT INSTITUTE EVALUATION: TRAINING IMPACT ON HEARING PRACTICE

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNational Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-05T14:00:39Z
dc.date.available2017-01-05T14:00:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe study described in this report further expands CANI’s training evaluation approach to examine whether judges’ participation in the Institute positively impacts their actual on-the-bench judicial practice. Using a quasi-experimental design, the extent to which participation in CANI impacts participants’ initial or preliminary protective hearing (PPH) practice was assessed. Judges provided the researchers with a sample of their pre-CANI PPHs which were then coded, analyzed, and compared to a sample of the same judges’ post-CANI PPHs. PPH practice was selected as the focus for the evaluation not only because CANI includes a major focus on the components of “best hearing practice” and the role of the judge in conducting effective hearings, but also because the PPH is a critical stage in the child abuse and neglect case process.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNational Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (2016). RESEARCH REPORT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT INSTITUTE EVALUATION: TRAINING IMPACT ON HEARING PRACTICE. Reno, NV: Author.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncjfcj.org/sites/default/files/NCJFCJ%20Research%20Report%20CANI%202016_0.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/3127
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNational Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judgesen_US
dc.subjectjudgesen_US
dc.subjecttraining evaluationen_US
dc.subjectdependency hearingen_US
dc.subjectcourtsen_US
dc.subjectjuvenile courten_US
dc.titleRESEARCH REPORT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT INSTITUTE EVALUATION: TRAINING IMPACT ON HEARING PRACTICEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources