Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Disclosure patterns

dc.contributor.authorElias, Hannah
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-11T19:31:33Z
dc.date.available2022-07-11T19:31:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe process of child disclosure of sexual abuse can be complex. Children often disclose abuse consistently across settings (continuous disclosure), though there is research to support that children may deny abuse or recant their allegations despite the abuse having truly occurred (London et al., 2008; Bradley & Wood, 1996; Malloy, Lyon, & Quas, 2007). In this study, data was collected from voluntary MTurk users (N = 688). Mock jurors responded to a survey assessing perceptions of child credibility, defendant guilt, and child susceptibility to external influence in response to each CSA disclosure pattern (continuous disclosure, denial, recantation). Additionally, expert witness testimony regarding typical child disclosure processes (present or absent) and child age (4- or 8-years-old) acted as independent variables. A number of significant results emerged with respect to disclosure patterns and expert witness presence. Forensic implications and future directions are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationElias, H. (2022). Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Disclosure Patterns. Master's thesis. West Virginia University.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11425&context=etd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/5498
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuseen_US
dc.subjectdisclosureen_US
dc.subjectcourten_US
dc.subjectjurorsen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.subjectcredibilityen_US
dc.subjectinconsistencyen_US
dc.titleJurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Disclosure patternsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files