Simulating denial increases false memory rates for abuse unrelated information

dc.contributor.authorBücken, C. A., Mangiulli, I., & Otgaar, H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T18:26:13Z
dc.date.available2022-03-07T18:26:13Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractVictims of abuse might deny their traumatic experiences. We studied mnemonic effects of simulating false denial of a child sexual abuse narrative. Participants (N = 127) read and empathized with the main character of this narrative. Next, half were instructed to falsely deny abuse-related information while others responded honestly in an interview. One week later, participants received misinformation for the narrative and interview. In a final source memory task, participants' memory for the narrative and interview was tested. Participants who falsely denied abuse-related information endorsed more abuse-unrelated misinformation about the event than honest participants. Abuse-related false memory rates did not statistically differ between the groups, and false denials were not related to omission errors about (1) the interview and (2) narrative. Hence, victim's memory for abuse-related information related to their experience might not be affected by a false denial, and inconsistencies surrounding the abuse-unrelated information are more likely to take place.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBücken, C. A., Mangiulli, I., & Otgaar, H. (2022). Simulating denial increases false memory rates for abuse unrelated information. Behavioral Sciences & the Law.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bsl.2566
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/5352
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBehavioral Sciences & the Lawen_US
dc.subjectInternational Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectNetherlandsen_US
dc.subjecttraumaen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuseen_US
dc.subjectmemoryen_US
dc.subjectfalse denialen_US
dc.titleSimulating denial increases false memory rates for abuse unrelated informationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files