Prosecuting Trafficking in Persons Cases: An Analysis of Local Strategies and Approaches, Final Report

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKristina Lugo-Graulich; Mark Myrent; Lisa M. Pierotte; Bradley T. Brick
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T17:54:51Z
dc.date.available2021-09-02T17:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe study focused on TIP 1) case identification and case-building; 2) when jurisdictions prosecute TIP under state statutes that target TIP or use alternative charges; and 3) how prosecutors approach victim identification, victim services, and increasing convictions and penalties for traffickers and buyers. The study methodology involved two phases. Phase I was a national survey of prosecutors, which intended to provide a nationwide overview of trends in local TIP prosecutions and the use of state TIP statutes by local prosecutors. This survey provided a 10-year update to and expansion of previous research on local prosecutorial approaches to TIP that had used data on cases prosecuted through 2008. Phase II of the current study was a series of four case studies of jurisdictions that have anti-TIP initiatives. Survey results indicated that local prosecutors have made significant progress in prosecuting TIP cases, based on the enforcement of their states’ laws; and they are engaged in practices intended to reach more victims and convict more offenders; however, the progress was uneven and needs improvement. The survey results also provided a context for the four case studies of Phase II. The four cases studies involved San Diego, Miami, New York, and Ramsey County/St. Paul. All four jurisdictions reported having prosecutorial staff, law enforcement officers, social workers, and others who are trained in trauma-informed interviewing and delivering or coordinating trauma-informed victim services. All sites reported having victim-centered prosecution techniques, working to increase enforcement of TIP laws (both selling and buying sex), and to increase the amount of dedicated trafficking beds in secure, long-term housing. Extensive tables, 91 references, and appended study instrumentsen_US
dc.identifier.citationLugo-Graulich, K., Myrent, M., Pierotte, L. M., & Brick, B. T. (2020). Prosecuting Trafficking in Persons Cases: An Analysis of Local Strategies and Approaches, Final Report. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/prosecuting-trafficking-persons-cases-analysis-local-strategies-and
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/5207
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJustice Research and Statistics Associationen_US
dc.subjecttraffickingen_US
dc.subjectvictim servicesen_US
dc.subjecttrauma-informeden_US
dc.subjectstatutesen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.titleProsecuting Trafficking in Persons Cases: An Analysis of Local Strategies and Approaches, Final Reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

CALiO Collection of Resources