Question types, responsiveness, and self-contradictions when prosecutors and defence attorneys question alleged victims of sexual abuse.

dc.contributor.authorAndrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Lyon, T. D.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-26T16:43:34Z
dc.date.available2015-01-26T16:43:34Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractWe examined 120 trial transcripts of 6- to 12-year-old children testifying to sexual abuse. Age and attorney role were analyzed in relation to question types, children’s responsiveness, and self-contradiction frequency. A total of 48,716 question-response pairs were identified. Attorneys used more closed-ended than open-ended prompts. Prosecutors used more invitations (3% vs. 0%), directives and option-posing prompts than defence attorneys, who used more suggestive prompts than prosecutors. Children were more unresponsive to defence attorneys than to prosecutors. Self-contradictions were identified in 95% of the cases. Defence attorneys elicited more self-contradictions than prosecutors, but nearly all prosecutors (86%) elicited at least one self-contradiction. Suggestive questions elicited more self-contradictions than any other prompt type. There were no associations with age. These findings suggest that neither prosecutors nor defence attorneys question children in developmentally appropriate ways. (Author Abstract)en_US
dc.identifier.citationAndrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Lyon, T. D. (2014). Question Types, Responsiveness and Self‐contradictions when Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Question Alleged Victims of Child Sexual Abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&context=thomaslyon
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/2102
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherApplied Cognitive Psychology.en_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuseen_US
dc.subjectcourten_US
dc.subjecttestimonyen_US
dc.subjectInternational Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.titleQuestion types, responsiveness, and self-contradictions when prosecutors and defence attorneys question alleged victims of sexual abuse.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files