Childhood memory and a history of different forms of abuse

dc.contributor.authorMelchert, Timothy P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T19:02:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T19:02:03Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.description.abstractA widespread professional and public controversy has recently emerged regarding recovered memories of child sexual abuse, but the prevalence and nature of these memories have received limited empirical examination. This study (N = 553 nonclinical participants) found that very similar proportions of those with histories of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse reported that they had periods without memory of their abuse ( 21 %, 18%, and 18%, respectively). The responses of approximately one half of these participants suggested that they lacked conscious access to their abuse memories, whereas the responses from the others suggested that they had conscious access to their memories. A great deal of variance was found in the reported quality of general childhood memory and the offset of infantile amnesia, and the findings also suggest that it is normative to recover memories of childhood. Each of these variables was also unrelated to the experience of child abuse. (Author Abstract)en_US
dc.identifier.citationMelchert, Timothy P. (1996). Childhood memory and a history of different forms of abuse. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27(5), 438-446.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1470&context=edu_fac
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/4794
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherProfessional Psychology: Research and Practiceen_US
dc.subjectchild abuseen_US
dc.subjectvictim psychologyen_US
dc.subjectlong term effectsen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.titleChildhood memory and a history of different forms of abuseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files