Changing Faces: Morphed Child Pornography Images and the First Amendment

dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, Stacey
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T15:49:04Z
dc.date.available2022-09-01T15:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPart I of this Article will explore the historical underpinnings of First Amendment jurisprudence as it pertains to actual child pornography from its inception as a criminal offense, to the morphed images depicting child pornography of today. Part II of this Article will discuss the harms morphed images cause. It will also explore the harm that circulation of other private material that is sexual in nature causes and discuss how this harm has been balanced against a defendant’s right to free speech. This nuanced approach allows us to better understand how courts might balance the harm that circulation of a morphed image causes with the First Amendment. Lastly, Part III of this Article lays out a cogent path forward. It proposes a workable solution that balances a defendant’s First Amendment right to free speech against the harm that circulation of morphed images causes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSteinberg, S. (2018). Changing faces: Morphed child pornography images and the first amendment. Emory Law Journal, 68, 909.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=elj
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/5543
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEmory Law Journalen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectchild pornographyen_US
dc.subjectchild sexual abuse materialen_US
dc.subjectmorphed imagesen_US
dc.subjecttraumaen_US
dc.subjectvictimsen_US
dc.subjectharmen_US
dc.titleChanging Faces: Morphed Child Pornography Images and the First Amendmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files