CALiO Search

Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ferguson, C. J.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-23T16:10:11Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-23T16:10:11Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Ferguson, C. J. (2013). Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 196-208. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www1.appstate.edu/~kms/classes/psy5150/Documents/Ferguson2013-spanking.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11212/3164
dc.description.abstract Social scientists continue to debate the impact of spanking and corporal punishment (CP) on negative child outcomes including externalizing and internalizing behavior problems and cognitive performance. Previous meta-analytic reviews have mixed long- and short-term studies and relied on bivariate r, which may inflate effect sizes. The current meta-analysis focused on longitudinal studies, and compared effects using bivariate r and better controlled partial r coefficients controlling for time-1 outcome variables. Consistent with previous findings, results based on bivariate r found small but non-trivial long-term relationships between spanking/CP use and negative outcomes. Spanking and CP correlated .14 and .18 respectively with externalizing problems, .12 and .21 with internalizing problems and − .09 and − .18 with cognitive performance. However, when better controlled partial r coefficients (pr) were examined, results were statistically significant but trivial (at or below pr = .10) for externalizing (.07 for spanking, .08 for CP) and internalizing behaviors (.10 for spanking, insufficient studies for CP) and near the threshold of trivial for cognitive performance (− .11 for CP, insufficient studies for spanking). It is concluded that the impact of spanking and CP on the negative outcomes evaluated here (externalizing, internalizing behaviors and low cognitive performance) are minimal. It is advised that psychologists take a more nuanced approach in discussing the effects of spanking/CP with the general public, consistent with the size as well as the significance of their longitudinal associations with adverse outcomes. (Author Abstract) en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Clinical Psychology Review en_US
dc.subject child abuse en_US
dc.subject long term effects en_US
dc.subject behavioral effects en_US
dc.subject psychological effects en_US
dc.subject meta-analysis en_US
dc.subject review en_US
dc.title Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account