Using dogs for emotional support of testifying victims of crime
Abstract
Courts and prosecutorial offices around the nation have started using service dogs to support
emotionally frail child witnesses who are unwilling to testify but for the calming presence of a
dog. Proponents claim that this new type of therapeutic jurisprudence helps bring criminal
defendants to justice in cases where the testimony of the complaining witness is crucial to the
prosecution’s case. Opponents fear the infringement of the defendants’ rights to a fair trial
because of the dogs’ potential to prejudice a jury to come out in favor of the witnesses.
This article analyzes the legal foundations supporting the use of service dogs for emotional
support of complaining witnesses in open court. Currently, the Federal Rules of Evidence give
trial judges wide discretion to allow evidence presentation methods deemed effective for the
ascertainment of the truth. Other federal law allows child witnesses to give testimony with the
emotional support of an adult attendant or through alternative methods such as closed-circuit
television or recorded statements. However, a defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation rights
may be held violated by such alternative methods, especially after the recent landmark case
Crawford v. Washington. In contrast, this is less likely to be the case if a witness gives live
testimony, even with the potentially prejudicial presence of a service dog. Case precedent
demonstrates that defendants’ right to a fair trial and the protection of the confrontation right
have been upheld in similar cases where minor witnesses used comfort objects for support.
This article concludes that legally sound reasons exist for allowing the use of service dogs in
court, but only in cases where the witness can demonstrate a truly compelling need for the
emotional support and only where the proper balancing with defendants’ rights is performed.
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
courthouse dogs, testimony
Citation
Dellinger, M. (2009). Using dogs for emotional support of testifying victims of crime. Animal Law, 15(2), 171-192.