Purcell, Rosemary ; Flower, Teresa ; Mullen, Paul E.2014-09-222014-09-222009Purcell, Rosemary ; Flower, Teresa ; Mullen, Paul E. (2009). Adolescent stalking: offence characteristics and effectiveness of intervention orders. Trends & Issues in Crime & Criminal Justice, 369, 1-6.https://www.secasa.com.au/assets/Statstics/adolescent-stalking.pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11212/1740To date, research on stalking has focused almost exclusively on adults. This paper examines the nature of stalking among adolescents to determine the characteristics of stalkers and their victims and the utility of intervention orders for managing this behaviour. Its findings indicate that a majority of perpetrators are male and almost all victims know their stalker, with prior relationships including ex-school peers, family members, ex-intimate partners and former friends. Threats and physical assaults occur in a majority of these cases and the impacts of adolescent stalking mirror those reported by adult victims, with anxiety and fear both commonly occurring. However, unlike adult stalking which is usually motivated by rejection, adolescent stalking most often occurs in the context of bullying. Intervention orders were granted in almost half of the study cases. Where applications where not granted, half the victims discontinued the application prior to hearing, almost one-quarter of victims did not attend the hearing and the remainder of cases were struck out. While intervention orders are commonly used to curtail stalking, their effectiveness is yet to be established. Longitudinal research which follows youth stalking cases is needed to determine the mental health, social and vocational impacts of stalking; reasons for high rates of intervention order discontinuation by victims; rates of recidivism into adulthood and the impact of intervention orders on offenders. (Author Forward)en-USchild abuseteensyouthemotional abusepsychological effectspreventionInternational ResourcesAustraliaresearchAdolescent stalking: Offence characteristics and effectiveness of intervention ordersArticle