Social cognitive explanations for juror’s reactions to child witness’ use of trial aids
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Nevada, Reno
Abstract
The use of facility dogs as a trial aid for child victims is becoming increasingly popular,
with over 40 states allowing the use of therapy dogs in courtrooms. Although facility
dogs are becoming a more common courtroom tool, little research exists that examines
the effects of the presence of facility dogs during testimony on jurors’ perceptions. This
project addressed some of the potential consequences of facility dog use on juror
perceptions and consisted of two studies. Study 1 used individual interviews to assess lay
beliefs and expectancies about people who use dogs as aids in public spaces, especially
during a trial. Study 2 experimentally manipulated the lay beliefs espoused in Study 1 by
varying trial aid usage and witness demeanor. This project had five goals. The first goal
was to evaluate what laypeople think about the use of dogs as service animals in public
spaces, especially courtrooms, as well as how dogs compare to other trial aids (Study 1).
Results indicate that, although not all people enjoy dogs, most people see dogs as
potentially physically (i.e., service dog) and emotionally supportive (e.g., ESA, facility
dog) beings. No participants believed that dogs should be unilaterally kept from public
spaces. The second goal was to assess anticipated perceptions (Study 1) and actual
perceptions of witnesses who use facility dogs or other trial aids in courtrooms after
witnessing a simulated trial (Study 2). Participants in Study 1 believed jurors would
mainly have neutral or positive impressions of a witness using a stuffed animal or facility
dog as a trial aid; participants in Study 2 demonstrated positive perceptions of the witness
regardless of experimental manipulations. The third goal was to examine the effects of
jurors’ emotional expectancies and witness’s emotional expression on perceptions of the
ii
witness and defendant (Study 2). Witness emotional expression did not directly affect
perceptions of the witness or defendant; however, witnesses with a neutral demeanor
were associated with slightly greater expectancy violation, which in turn led to less
positive perceptions of the witness. The fourth goal was to assess the role of juror felt
emotion on perceptions of the witness or defendant (Study 2). Results indicate that
increases in state anger were associated with more positive perceptions of the witness and
more negative perceptions of the defendant; no other state emotion affected perceptions.
The fifth and final goal of this study was to evaluate the role of individual differences on
juror perceptions (Study 2). Results indicate that greater rape myth acceptance (RMA) is
related to more negative perceptions of the witness and more positive perceptions of the
defendant, whereas trait empathy was associated with more positive perceptions of the
witness and more negative perceptions of the defendant. Implications for this research
include better understanding the effects of facility dog use on juror perceptions and
verdicts. Study results can be used to inform policy decisions regarding the acceptance of
facility dogs in courtrooms.
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
facility dogs, court, child testimony, juror perceptions, demeanor, jury decision-making
Citation
McDermott, C. (2022). Social cognitive explanations for juror’s reactions to child witness’ use of trial aids (Doctoral dissertation).. University of Nevada, Reno.