Effects of child age and type of detail reported on credibility of child abuse allegations
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Abstract
With repeated experiences, children’s reports of an event tend to contain fewer episodic, contextually embedded details and more inconsistencies. In one prior study, children who experienced a play event four times were rated by mock jurors as less accurate and less believable than children who experienced it once, although there was no difference in their actual accuracy (Connolly, Price, Lavoie, & Gordon, 2008). In the present study, 405 undergraduate students read one of four scenarios of a child sexual abuse allegation in a 2 (age: 4- or 10-yearsold) by 2 (experience: single or multiple) factorial design. Overall, regardless of age, participants rated the child alleging repeated abuse as significantly less believable, honest, cognitively competent, and consistent than the child alleging a single abuse occurrence. Jurors may need education about the effects of repeated experience on children’s accounts of abuse in order to reach appropriate decisions. (Author Abstract)
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
child abuse, disclosure, cred, revictimization, age, research, believability
Citation
Kulisek, Natalie Ryan. (2014). Effects of child age and type of detail reported on credibility of child abuse allegations. (MS thesis), University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.