CALiO Search

Improving measurement of child abuse and neglect: A systematic review and analysis of national prevalence studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mathews, B., Pacella, R., Dunne, M. P., Simunovic, M., & Marston, C.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-23T19:20:41Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-23T19:20:41Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Mathews, B., Pacella, R., Dunne, M. P., Simunovic, M., & Marston, C. (2020). Improving measurement of child abuse and neglect: A systematic review and analysis of national prevalence studies. PLoS one, 15(1), e0227884. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986759/pdf/pone.0227884.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11212/4681
dc.description.abstract Objectives Child maltreatment through physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, and exposure to domestic violence, causes substantial adverse health, educational and behavioural consequences through the lifespan. The generation of reliable data on the prevalence and characteristics of child maltreatment in nationwide populations is essential to plan and evaluate public health interventions to reduce maltreatment. Measurement of child maltreatment must overcome numerous methodological challenges. Little is known to date about the extent, nature and methodological quality of these national studies. This study aimed to systematically review the most comprehensive national studies of the prevalence of child maltreatment, and critically appraise their methodologies to help inform the design of future studies. Methods Guided by PRISMA and following a published protocol, we searched 22 databases from inception to 31 May 2019 to identify nationwide studies of the prevalence of either all five or at least four forms of child maltreatment. We conducted a formal quality assessment and critical analysis of study design. Results This review identified 30 national prevalence studies of all five or at least four forms of child maltreatment, in 22 countries. While sound approaches are available for different settings, methodologies varied widely in nature and robustness. Some instruments are more reliable and obtain more detailed and useful information about the characteristics of the maltreatment, including its nature, frequency, and the relationship between the child and the person who inflicted the maltreatment. Almost all studies had limitations, especially in the level of detail captured about maltreatment, and the adequacy of constructs of maltreatment types. Conclusions Countries must invest in rigorous national studies of the prevalence of child maltreatment. Studies should use a sound instrument containing appropriate maltreatment constructs, and obtain nuanced information about its nature. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher PLoS One en_US
dc.subject research en_US
dc.subject International Resources en_US
dc.subject Australia en_US
dc.subject child maltreatment en_US
dc.subject prevalence en_US
dc.subject review en_US
dc.subject data en_US
dc.title Improving measurement of child abuse and neglect: A systematic review and analysis of national prevalence studies en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account