Dynamics of repeated interviews with children
Date
2016
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Abstract
Concerns regarding repeat interviews with child witnesses include greater use of suggestive
questions in later interviews due to bias, and that children may appear inconsistent and,
therefore, be judged as less reliable in court. UK transcripts of first and second interviews
with 21 child victims/witnesses (conducted by qualified interviewers) were coded for
question types and child responses. Interviewers were consistent in their proportional use of
question types across interviews. Furthermore, children were as informative in second
interviews as in first, mostly providing new details consistent with their prior recall. Despite
the apparent lack of training in conducting repeated interviews, no negative effects were
found; second interviews appeared to be conducted as well as initial interviews and they
provided new details without many contradictions. It is suggested that when a child’s
testimony is paramount for an investigation, a well-conducted supplementary interview may
be an effective way of gaining further investigative leads. (Author Abstract)
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
child abuse, forensic interviewing, multiple interviews, research, International Resources, United Kingdom
Citation
Waterhouse, Genevieve F. ; Ridley, Anne M. ; Bull, Ray ; La Rooy, David ; Wilcock, Rachel. (2016). Dynamics of repeated interviews with children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 713-721.