"Can You Remember What Was in Your Pocket When You Were Stung by a Bee?”: Eliciting Cues to Deception by Asking the Unanticipated
Date
2010
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Criminology Journal
Abstract
In this paper we focused on children’s deception (10-12 years, Experiment 1), and adult’s ability detect
deception in children (Experiment 2). The self-presentational perspective (DePaulo, 1992) suggests that both liars and
truth tellers will try to act in a convincing manner to be assessed as truth tellers. By asking unanticipated questions we put
the liars in the following dilemma: If they did not answer they would risk being considered avoidant and, thus, run the risk
of being discredited. On the other hand, if they did answer they would risk failing to act like a truth teller, and thereby run
the risk of being discredited. In Experiment 1 we predicted, and found, that liars’ attempt to actively create an honest
impression (answer) overruled their attempt to passively imitate truth tellers (not answering). Specifically, liars (vs truth
tellers) were more willing to answer the unanticipated questions. Experiment 2 showed that adult observers had difficulty
when discriminating between lying and truth-telling children (overall accuracy rate: 57%). Lie-catchers who had been
exposed to children answering unanticipated questions did not outperform lie-catchers who had watched children
answering anticipated questions. Our successful attempt to elicit a diagnostic cue to deception (willingness to answer
unanticipated questions) is placed within the new line of research aimed at increasing lie-catchers’ ability to detect
deception.
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
Children's deception, cues to deception, unanticipated questions
Citation
Liu, M., Granhag, P. A., Landström, S., Hjelmsaeter, E. R. A., Strömwall, L., & Vrij, A. (2010). Can You Remember What Was in Your Pocket When You Were Stung by a Bee?': Eliciting Cues to Deception by Asking the Unanticipated. Open Criminology Journal, 3(1), 31-36.