dc.contributor.author |
DeMitchell, T. A. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-11-28T18:36:40Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-11-28T18:36:40Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
DeMitchell, T. A. (2002). The duty to protect: Blackstone's doctrine of in loco parentis: A lens for viewing the sexual abuse of students. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 1, 17-52. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=elj |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11212/4067 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper will use Blackstone's doctrine of in loco parentis
as a lens for viewing the sexual abuse of a student by an educator.
It will attempt to show that the current theories of responsibility-respondent
superior, special relationship, and Title
IX-regarding the sexual abuse of students are inadequate.
Blackstone's in loco parentis theory of responsibility may provide
a more appropriate vehicle for the protection of children in
school. If educators act in the place of parents, should they be
held to a similar duty to protect the children entrusted to their
care? |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal |
en_US |
dc.subject |
educator sexual misconduct |
en_US |
dc.subject |
child sexual abuse |
en_US |
dc.subject |
schools |
en_US |
dc.subject |
teachers |
en_US |
dc.subject |
law |
en_US |
dc.subject |
trust |
en_US |
dc.title |
The Duty to Protect: Blackstone 's Doctrine of In Loco Parentis: A Lens for Viewing the Sexual Abuse of Students |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |