CALiO Search

The Fate of Childhood: Legal Models of Children and the Parent-Child Relationship

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dolgin, J. L.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-29T15:16:59Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-29T15:16:59Z
dc.date.issued 1997
dc.identifier.citation Dolgin, J. L. (1997). The Fate of Childhood: Legal Models of Children and the Parent-Child Relationship. Albany Law Review, Vol. 61, 345-431. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=faculty_scholarship
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11212/3921
dc.description.abstract This Article examines, in three parts, the transformation of childhood, and the law's complicated, rarely satisfying, often contradictory responses. In Part I, the Article describes a set of fundamental ideological shifts, during the past several decades, in understandings of the family in American society. In Part II, the Article outlines three distinct models through which, since the start of the twentieth century, the law has understood children and the parent-child relationship. The first model (the Traditional Model), though largely replaced by a second (the Transforming Traditional Model), continues to be invoked, primarily to justify the second. Though clearly generated from the first, the second model connects as well to a third, very different model for understanding children and their relationships to their parents.' This third model (the Individualist Model), more often applied outside the domestic context than within, reflects modernity's suggestion that children should be assimilated to an egalitarian view of interaction that prizes autonomy, and that denies any fundamental distinction between childhood and adulthood. In Part III, the Article focuses on the many contradictions generated by the second model as it attempts to mediate between the demands of modernity and of tradition.' This analysis focuses upon a set of decisions rendered by the United States Supreme Court beginning in 1976 that concern the abortion right of pregnant minors. In addition, Part III delimits two general legal responses to the dilemma presented by society's continuing concern to preserve venerable images of childhood, and its increasing inability to actualize those images within the social world of contemporary families. (Author Text) en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Albany Law Review, en_US
dc.subject child abuse en_US
dc.subject child protection en_US
dc.subject jurisprudence en_US
dc.subject legal opinion en_US
dc.title The Fate of Childhood: Legal Models of Children and the Parent-Child Relationship en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account