Other People: A child's age predicts a source's effect on memory
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Abstract
For decades, researchers have investigated the effects of various interviewing
techniques used in child witness interviews. One particular technique yet to be explored
fully is Other People, that is, mentioning other witnesses’ alleged statements when
interviewing a child. This study thus examined how the source of others’ information
affects children’s memory and source monitoring as a function of age (7–18).
Children and adolescents (N = 110) watched a 10-min video and were then
questioned about the witnessed event 1 week later using a series of yes/no questions.
Throughout this series of questions, the source of outside information (peer vs. adult vs.
no source) and its veracity (correct vs. incorrect) were manipulated.
Findings indicated that an adult source was more detrimental to witness
accuracy than a peer source or no source, but this detrimental effect diminished as
witness age increased. Source monitoring data mirrored this pattern: As age increased, so
did accurate source attributions for information attributed to an adult.
Overall findings suggest that information source in conjunction with
witness age should be considered when assessing the effect of outside information on
child and adolescent memory.
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
children's memory, effect of age, forensic interview
Citation
Carol, R. N., & Compo, N. S. (2017). Other People: A child's age predicts a source's effect on memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 74-87.