CALiO Search

A suggestion on suggestion

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Friedman, R. D., & Ceci, S. J.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-27T15:37:15Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-27T15:37:15Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier.citation Friedman, R. D., & Ceci, S. J. (2001). A suggestion on suggestion. University of Michigan Law Quadrangle Notes, Fall-Winter, 2001), 100-108. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2382&context=articles
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11212/2114
dc.description.abstract Part I of the full article briefly describes the history and current slate of research into children's suggestibility. In this part, we argue that, although psychological researchers disagree considerably over the degree to which he suggestibility of young children may lead to false allegations of sexual abuse, there is an overwhelming consensus that children are suggestible to a degree that, we believe, must be regarded as significant. In presenting this argument, we respond to the contentions of revisionist scholars, particularly those recently expressed by Professor Lyon. We show that there is good reason to believe the use of highly suggestive questions remains very common, and hat these questions present a significant possibility that children will make false allegations even on matters such as sexual abuse. Part II develops a framework, using Bayesian probability theory, for considering the findings described in Part I. We argue that there is merit to the traditional - and constitutionally compelled - view that an inaccurate criminal conviction is a far worse result than a failure to reach an accurate conviction, and that this perspective should inform the design of legal systems. With this in mind, we explain that even relatively slight probabilities of false allegations are potentially significant. Moreover, we show that the very substantial probability that a child who has been abused will fail to reveal the abuse tends, perhaps counterintuitively, to diminish the probative value of an allegation of abuse when it is actually made. In the discussion below, taken from Part III of the longer article, we turn to discussion of the legal implications of our analysis. (Author Abstract) en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher University of Michigan Law Quadrangle Notes, en_US
dc.subject child abuse en_US
dc.subject interview en_US
dc.subject questioning en_US
dc.subject credibility en_US
dc.subject law en_US
dc.subject suggestibility en_US
dc.subject review en_US
dc.title A suggestion on suggestion en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account