CALiO Search

A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Construct Validity of Child Anxiety Disorders in a Clinical Sample

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Langer, D. A., Wood, J. J., Bergman, R. L., & Piacentini, J. C.
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-14T17:26:53Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-14T17:26:53Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Langer, D. A., Wood, J. J., Bergman, R. L., & Piacentini, J. C. (2010). A multitrait–multimethod analysis of the construct validity of child anxiety disorders in a clinical sample. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41(5), 549-561. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917549/pdf/10578_2010_Article_187.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11212/1418
dc.description.abstract The present study examines the construct validity of separation anxiety disorder (SAD), social phobia (SoP), panic disorder (PD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in a clinical sample of children. Participants were 174 children, 6 to 17 years old (94 boys) who had undergone a diagnostic evaluation at a university hospital based clinic. Parent and child ratings of symptom severity were assessed using the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC). Diagnostician ratings were obtained from the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children and Parents (ADIS: C/P). Discriminant and convergent validity were assessed using confirmatory factor analytic techniques to test a multitrait–multimethod model. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the current classification of these child anxiety disorders. The disorders demonstrated statistical independence from each other (discriminant validity of traits), the model fit better when the anxiety syndromes were specified than when no specific syndromes were specified (convergent validity), and the methods of assessment yielded distinguishable, unique types of information about child anxiety (discriminant validity of methods). Using a multi-informant approach, these findings support the distinctions between childhood anxiety disorders as delineated in the current classification system, suggesting that disagreement between informants in psychometric studies of child anxiety measures is not due to poor construct validity of these anxiety syndromes. en_US
dc.publisher Child Psychiatry & Human Development en_US
dc.subject child anxiety en_US
dc.subject diagnosis en_US
dc.subject assessment en_US
dc.subject tests en_US
dc.subject psychometric research en_US
dc.title A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Construct Validity of Child Anxiety Disorders in a Clinical Sample en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account