Racial disproportionality in reported and substantiated child abuse and neglect: An examination of systematic bias.
Date
2003
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Children and Youth Services Review
Abstract
Using data from Minnesota of 2000, we show that measures of discrimination in maltreatment substantiation are inflated by a failure to disaggregate counties with large minority populations from those with small minority populations. Racial disparities in substantiation rates, conditional upon reports to child protective service workers, are not huge. Nonetheless, measures of discrimination -- once one accounts for characteristics of victims, offenders, reporters, counties and types of maltreatment--are non-trivial. For African Americans they are higher in the state as a whole than in the counties that have the largest share of minority children. Although the discrimination measures do not vanish when disaggregated analysis is performed, our findings suggest that caution should be displayed when reporting disproportionality statistics that include data from widely dispersed geographical areas.
Description
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
maltreatment, child abuse, neglect, systematic bias, racial disproportionality, reported abuse, substantiation, discrimination, statistics, race
Citation
Ards, S. D., Myers, S. L., Malkis Erin, A., & Zhou, L. (2003). Racial disproportionality in reported and substantiatedchild abuse and neglect: An examination of systematic bias. Children and youth services review, 25(5-6), 375-392.