CALiO Search

Child Sexual Abuse and the State: Applying Critical Outsider Methodologies to Legislative Policy

Show simple item record

dc.creator Andrew, R. P.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-09-19T16:27:34Z
dc.date.available 2013-09-19T16:27:34Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11212/1126
dc.identifier.uri http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID904100_code591048.pdf?abstractid=904100&mirid=1
dc.description Sexual assaults are punished as serious felonies, often resulting in the lengthiest terms of incarceration meted out by the state. When the perpetrator is an adult and the victim is a child, many states further enhance the penalty for sexual assault by increasing the minimum available sentence and creating more stringent conditions for release. However, many states offer a discounted criminal charge to perpetrators of child sexual assault who are related to their victims. Loopholes written into state laws permit related perpetrators who have been convicted to escape penalties which would otherwise be mandatory for child sexual offenders, including imprisonment, mandatory sentence enhancements, and sexual offender registration. Prosecutors may offer probation-only sentences and forms of judicial diversion available only to related perpetrators. In some cases, the convicted perpetrator may return to live in the home of the child-victim. The article employs a problem-solving methodology rooted in critical outsider theory to critique these loopholes in state child protective systems as dangerously unsound policy. Using California as a case study, the article details the laws that authorize a prosecutor to permit convicted child sexual offenders to sidestep the charges, penalties, and administrative safeguards required by state law, as long as they are related to their victims. It examines the legal history of state incest laws and the social and political responses during the last century to the problem of sexual abuse of children in their homes. Criminal and medical studies are adduced to demonstrate that related and non-related perpetrators cannot be differentiated, either in their criminal acts or their psychological makeup. The article concludes with model legislation drafted to correct the flaws identified in state penal code.
dc.publisher UC Davis Law Review
dc.subject policy
dc.subject Law -- state
dc.subject Abuse-sexual
dc.title Child Sexual Abuse and the State: Applying Critical Outsider Methodologies to Legislative Policy
dc.type Text


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account